Internet Psychologist Graham Jones
From the media? CLICK HERE FOR MY MEDIA INFORMATION

Search this site


 

Get these
articles sent
directly to you
each day

Your Email Address:

 

RSS Feed RSS Subscribe

Add to Google

Add to My Yahoo

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to Technorati Favorites

Link With Us - Web Directory

blogoriffic.com

BRDTracker

Add to Pageflakes

http://www.wikio.com



Add To Google Toolbar

 

Previous Articles

The Budget News doesn't make good reading


Is your face on your web site?


Trust - it's all important on the Internet


The World has changed: did you notice?


Your Mum is frightened of the Internet


How not to succeed with online media


Social networking is market research


Last of the TV Oscars? Could be if the Eurovision ...


What's wrong with Facebook?


Word of mouth is still important on the Internet


 

Archives

 

Topics

Internet Marketing

Blogging

Social Networking

Internet Shopping

Online success

Internet Psychology

Future of the Internet

 

 

Your Free Guide
to Internet Success

 

Free Guide To Internet Success

 

Claim your free guide to success in the age of the Internet

 

Name

Email

 

 

 

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Psychologists prove Google is almost human

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley have been pitting the wits of Google against human volunteers. Their study looked at the PageRank of words searched for on Google and compared them with a list of words produced by volunteers. The research, published in Psychological Science, confirms my view that Google is actually preventing your web site from succeeding; not because of Google, but because of the way we react to it.

The human volunteers were asked to produce the first word that came to mind when shown a letter of the alphabet that had rare frequency - such as Q, K and Z. These words were then searched for on Google and the average PageRank of the pages calculated. PageRank is a proprietary Google device for working out the relative "value" of a web page. If the computer based, mathematical calculations of Google's algorithm approach human capabilities then you would expect to see higher page ranks for the more common "first response" words from the human volunteers.

The study showed that indeed there was a relationship, suggesting that Google's computer modelling is similar to the way the human mind works. In other words, it seems that Google matches our complex brains pretty well. But PageRank requires human input for it to work. PageRank is based on citation indexing - in other words, the calculation of a web page's rank depends upon human beings choosing to add links referencing that page. So, without human intervention, PageRank would flounder.

And this human intervention is essential in the success of your web site. Make your pages interesting and useful - rather than just full of puffery - and humans that read it and like it will recommend it in various links. Because Google's PageRank appears to match human analysis so closely this means that the more your pages appeal to people - the more it will be liked by Google and your PageRank will rise.

It's just more evidence, as if we needed it, that concentrating on Google is facing in the wrong direction. Focus your attention on your human readers and Google will follow.

Labels: ,


Add this story to:

| BlinkList | BlogMarks | del.icio.us | Digg | Furl | Google | LinkRoll | Lycos |

| ma.gnolia | Netscape | Newsvine | Ning | reddit | Simpy | Spurl | Squidoo | Wink |


Email this story to your friends:

 

Readers' Comments:

Post a Comment

 

 

Permalink: Psychologists prove Google is almost human