Read this…! You’ll like it…honest….!

Businessman holding a touchpad pc, reading a newspaperWhat do you like best – reading something on-screen, or having a piece of paper in your hands and reading from that? Consistently, people claim that the subjective experience of reading from print is better than screen reading. Although we have to read millions of words from our screens each year, we all seem to prefer having a book in our hands, or getting our fingers grubby with newsprint. How wrong we can be.

A new study shows that we actually read better from screens than we do from print. It confirms my personal finding that when I read from my Amazon Kindle I appear to be able to read much faster – something other Kindle users have told me they also experience. The researchers in Germany used brain wave studies and eye-tracking analysis to compare how we read from print, from an e-book reader and from a tablet screen. The worst performer was print. It seems that even though we claim that reading from print is better, our brains are actually telling a different story. We read better from screens – even if it appears we read more slowly according to some previous studies.

There are some possible explanations for  the new findings. Our reading ability is dependent upon the contrast between the words we are looking at and the page they are one. With print, the contrast can be relatively low, for low quality paper for instance, making it more difficult for us to read. However, if the paper is bright, the contrast can be too high – disturbing our reading again. Indeed, one of the ways in which people with dyslexia can be helped to read is to reduce the contrast of the paper, such as printing on blue or yellow sheets. This makes it easier for people with dyslexia to read because one of the issues they have is a difficulty in interpreting text when the contrast is too high. Reducing the contrast helps.

On screen, the contrast is different – your eyes are receiving transmitted light, not reflected light. And it seems that transmitted light is easier for us to read from, than the scattering of light due to reflections. Some anecdotal evidence also suggests that people with reading difficulties and learning difficulties find it easier to read from screens than from print.

In other words, there is growing evidence that screen reading is easier for our brains to cope with, than reading from print. Our brains process it faster. It also appears that screen reading leads to deeper information processing, suggesting it may well be easier to remember things we read on screen, compared with print.

And what does this mean for your online business? It means you should stop worrying about giving people loads to read on your website. The fact that people will find it easier to read your online content and that they process it more deeply as a result can only be good for your business – assuming you provide loads to read via a screen (and that also means having your content available on the Kindle).

Read this...! You'll like it...honest....! 1

2 thoughts on “Read this…! You’ll like it…honest….!”

  1. I don't doubt these findings, though I would say I still love holding a book or magazine. Partly at least because it's a more interactive experience (pages turn without asking, you turn 2 pages at the same time, it falls on your face when you fall asleep, you can hide behind a newspaper etc), but I've yet to try a Kindle etc for any length of time. I love the idea of having a whole book (or 90) in such a slim package though.

    As a professional writer and editor, I find that I pick up more errors on paper than I do on-screen. That said, I do 99% of my editing on-screen now as I do not want to waste resources by printing, especially as I am not going to keep the printouts. Thanks for the info.

Comments are closed.

Like this article?

Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Facebook
Share via email

Other posts that might be of interest

Internet users are at an advantage

Yesterday I was running a workshop where we looked at the kinds of things that were essential for children. We came to the conclusion that there wasn’t much essential, except clean water, protection from the

Read More »

Business Week on technology and culture

The McGraw Hill international weekly, Business Week, included comment from me today on the cultural differences in technological usage. I pointed out that the boardrooms of global businesses need a conceptual shift if they are

Read More »