This site is dedicated to helping you understand online behaviour by providing you with blog posts, articles, news items, multimedia and downloads on web psychology

You don’t have to be the biggest to be the best

Is bigger better?So here’s today’s pub quiz question: which tech company performed overall better than any other technology firm in 2012? The chances are you might say Apple or Google. After all, Apple had by far the highest net income in 2012 in spite of today’s excellent results from Google. You might be tempted to answer the question with Facebook or perhaps take a punt on Groupon – yet both of those had dismal stock market performances, wiping large amounts off their valuation.

For a company to be doing well its net income has to be good – preferably better than last year’s – plus its actual value should increase, as reflected in share price. So which company had both of those in 2012?

The answer is a business which only has 200m users – absolutely tiny compared to the more than 1bn on Facebook or similar amounts that use Google every day. Gosh more people even own an iPod than use this business. But the company – in spite of its comparative smallness in the technology sector – saw its stock market performance outshine the competition and its net revenues rise by the greatest percentage.

The company is LinkedIn. So the second pub quiz question therefore is this: what is different about LinkedIn in comparison with other tech companies?

The answer is that unlike Apple, or Google or Microsoft, the company is focused on one thing – business networking for jobs. Indeed, only recently the firm has started to strip out unnecessary parts of its website which take it away from that core – such as LinkedIn Answers.

Many people who run big business seem to think that the answer to their survival and success is to get bigger. They focus on big numbers, big projects, big statistics. They grow by acquisition bringing in loosely connected services and products which “extend our offer”. Ultimately, all that does is confuse the staff and confuse the customers.

LinkedIn – thus far – is bucking that trend. It is focusing, focusing and focusing. Sure, it will lose people who would like it to provide more services, but those who remain will be the core customers who rely on the company and will help it generate even more income.

It is a lesson for us all. Diversification is a mantra from big business – and frequently it fails to deliver what the directors hope for. Often it leads to problems.

Focusing on core products and services and your niche customers is the way to success – which the latest statistics on tech companies shows. Bigger is not always better.

, ,

Comments are closed.

Home | Blog | Articles | Newswire | Multimedia | Downloads | Newsletter | About | Contact | Speaking | Press | Accessibility | Privacy | Cookies |

VAT No: 348 4830 29 | Tel: 0118 336 9710 | Kemp House, 152 City Road, London EC1V 2NX

Some of the links on this page are Affiliate Links and lead to sites where I can earn commission income should you buy anything.
Graham Jones is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to
provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to
This site uses cookies. For more information please see the Privacy page.
Most images are used under license from iStockphoto, GraphicStock or Fotolia

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.